This long post is about “the paradox of Spain.”
For a brief, golden period in the first half of the 16th century, Spain was the richest and most powerful nation in the world. Completing the “reconquista,” Spanish Catholics pushed the Moors fully out of Spain. Empire building through marriage gave control over large parts of Europe, and the colonization of the Americas (a much bigger and more impressive event) created a source of fantastic new wealth.
Almost immediately, however, Spain began a 400-year period of slumbering decline relative to the rest of Europe, seeming only to awaken after Franco’s death in 1976.
Spain’s progress in the last 30 years has been impressive, and the country now seems firmly on the right track.
At the great risk of sounding like a “2 x 4 expert” (two weeks and four books), Spain’s history seems to illustrate some universal and intertwined impediments to success:
Impediment #1 – strong role for the monarchy, but weak monarchs. Although the crown had almost complete authority, the history books describe reign after reign of weak, highly conservative, physically frail, and frequently unstable Spanish monarchs. (Thanks, inbreeding!) One of my favorite descriptions was of a 17th century crown prince who died of “excessive debauchery” at the age of 17. Given the perpetual power vacuum on the throne, even when new royal families took over, many chronic problems (eg, bloated and tax-advantaged aristocracy, desertification) and structural tensions (eg, wildly different economic growth rates by region) went unresolved for centuries. In some cases, the monarch made incredibly bad decisions (eg, invade England in 1588), but most of the sins were of omission. Without leadership, Spain was unable to adapt to the changing world. This is conservatism at its worst.
Impediment #2 – unchecked conservative influences, in this case the Catholic Church and the aristocracy. The Church seemed to resist all forms of constructive change to Spanish society, and also discouraged broadbased non-religious learning. With weak monarchs, frequently the king’s or queen’s confessor emerged as the most powerful person in the country.
Impediment #3 – limited cohesion as a nation-state. The country grew up as a set of autonomous kingdoms, each with different economies and societal structures. Although the crown was generally unified since 1489, Spain still feels like a confederacy of small, semi-autonomous nations, governed by the Castilians from Madrid. The Basques and the Catalonians get the most attention for their separate languages and desires for autonomy, but Mallorcans still write their street signs in Mallorquin, and the Andalusians are heavily influenced by their Moorish heritage. Sports now unify the nation to a certain extent, (particularly football and Rafael Nadal), but national identity still seems loose. Most successful nation states act aggressively to unify the people through language, culture, national mythology, and shared experience.
Impediment #4 – social rigidity and lack of opportunity. Spain’s aristocrats were never put under pressure to give up their (highly tax-advantaged) economic and social privileges. Generation after generation had wonderful lives without having to do much. At the other end of the spectrum, there were very few avenues for talented, ambitious, entrepreneurial Spaniards to improve their lots in life. The major exception (ie, the biggest opportunity) was to go to the American colonies, which many of the best did, creating Spain’s greatest successes.
Impediment #5 – the “dog that didn’t bark”. It isn’t clear why Spain never had a reformation or a full-on revolution during the 400-year slumber. Maybe the pressures for change never became acute because the decline was so slow, the Church and the monarchy/aristocracy acted as stabilizing forces, and there was not a significant class of intellectuals to get the masses stirred up with Locke and Rousseau (or Marx and Engels). When the rush for change came, in the late 1920s and early 1930s, it was too much and too fast, and provoked the Franco backlash. Another 40 years of stagnation followed.
Since Franco’s death, Spain seems to have addressed a lot of the long-standing problems and weaknesses in the Spanish economy/culture with remarkable speed. Joining the EU, reforming the constitution, deregulating and liberating economic assets, introducing flexibility into labor markets have all combined to accelerate growth while accentuating Spain’s positive characteristics.
After such a long delay, Spain seems to be poised for decades of growth, prosperity, and freedom, slowly regaining its position near the pinnacle of the world.
This is an exciting time in Spanish history.